Blake at LISNews.com has gotten all three candidates for ALA President to agree to answer questions from LISNews readers. Post your questions here; Blake will filter and send tomorrow, so hurry up now. [note]: all questions have been sent to the candidates.
Ben writes: "Although The Alexandria Business Plan is filled with business speak (thanks to a well meaning business student) it is actually about creating an inter library card catalog & collaborative filtering network. There is also a link to comments on the plan."
Dew writes in: "An 'Ask Slashdot' query asks about the existance of 'Open Source software for maintaining a small to medium sized library card-catalog.' The library in question is about 5K volumes. Hilarity ensues." Hmm maybe the underground should take off hits for this one as ask /. links back to us... :P
If you've been a linux fan for a while you're probably familiar with Joe Pranevich's timely overviews of what's new in major kernel releases. As seen at slashdot, he's recently updated Wonderful World of Linux 2.4 to cover everything in Linux 2.3.99-pre3 (i.e. the kernel is in feature-freeze (aka bugfix only) until 2.4 shows up). His overview comes from LinuxToday.com.
If you're a librarian and you haven't thought through what napster means yet, get thinking. Many folks are perturbed about how easy it is to violate copyright using napster. "Docster: Instant Document Delivery" describes a napster-like system for libraries which builds copyright compliance in from the start.
Jeremy F. sent in a pointer to this piece at oreillynet.com, a transcript of everybody's friend Tim's talk entitled "Open Source: The Model for Collaboration in the Age of the Internet". The talk was delivered at Computers, Freedom and Privacy in Toronto last week. Besides being a good read, anyone who follows all the links in this piece and reads on will be pretty much up-to-date with many major open source goings-on.
There is now a place for you to post articles, whitepapers, opinion pieces, etc. related to oss4lib and Open Source projects for libraries. Anyone can post comments on your article, too. Click -articles- above, check it out.
This thread to be used for discussion of said article.
dashTomdot pointed out an article at Salon that asks the medical/legal question "Who's at fault when software fails?" It's a good reminder that the upper bound is never simply what is possible...